banner

Outward and Inward Morality

07/10/05

Permalink 09:10:13 pm, by dissidens Email , 619 words, 1833 views   English (US)
Categories: Old Main

Outward and Inward Morality

Excerpted from a sermon* of Johannes Eckhart.

Outward as well as inward morality helps to form the idea of true Christian freedom. We are right to lay stress on inwardness, but in this world there is no inwardness without an outward expression. If we regard the soul as the formative principle of the body, and God as the formative principle of the soul, we have a profounder principle of ethics than is found in Pantheism. The fundamental thought of this system is the real distinction between God and the world, together with their real inseparability, for only really distinct elements can interpenetrate each other.

The inner work is first of all the work of God’s grace in the depth of the soul which subsequently distributes itself among the faculties of the soul, in that of Reason appearing as Belief, in that of Will as Love, and in that of Desire as Hope. When the Divine Light penetrates the soul, it is united with God as light with light. This is the light of faith. Faith bears the soul to heights unreachable by her natural senses and faculties.

As the peculiar faculty of the eye is to see form and colour, and of the ear to hear sweet tones and voices, so is aspiration peculiar to the soul. To relax from ceaseless aspiration is sin. This energy of aspiration directed to and grasping God, as far as is possible for the creature, is called Hope, which is also a divine virtue. Through this faculty the soul acquires such great confidence that she deems nothing in the Divine Nature beyond her reach.

The third faculty is the inward Will, which, always turned to God like a face, absorbs to itself love from God. According to the diverse directions in which redemptive Grace through the Holy Spirit is imparted to the different faculties of men, it finds corresponding expression as one of the Spirit’s seven gifts. This impartation constitutes man’s spiritual birth which brings him out of sin into a state of grace while natural birth makes him a sinner.

As God can only be seen by His own light, so He can only be loved by His own love. The merely natural man is incapable of this, because nature by itself is incapable of responding to the Divine Love and is confined within its own circle. Therefore it is necessary for Grace, which is a simple supernatural power, to elevate the natural faculties to union in God above the merely temporal objects of existence. The possibility of love to God is grounded in the relative likeness between man and God. If the soul is to reach its moral goal, i.e. Godlikeness, it must become inwardly like God through grace, and a spiritual birth which is the spring of true morality. The inner work that man has to do is the practical realization of Grace: without this, all outward work is ineffectual for salvation. Virtue is never mere virtue, it is either from God, or through God, or in God. All the soul’s works which are to inherit an everlasting recompense must be carried on in God. They are rewarded by Him in proportion as they are carried on in Him, for the soul is an instrument of God whereby He carries on His work.

The essence of morality is inwardness, the intensity of will from which it springs, and the nobleness of the aim for which it is practiced. When a good work is done by a man, he is free of it, and through that freedom is liker and nearer to his Original than he was before.

* http://www.ccel.org/ccel/eckhart/sermons.html

Trackback address for this post:

This is a captcha-picture. It is used to prevent mass-access by robots.

Please enter the characters from the image above. (case insensitive)

Comments, Trackbacks, Pingbacks:

1 Comment from: inkwell [Member] Email
Two quotes from these sermons:

"If the soul is to know God it must forget itself and lose itself, for as long as it contemplates self, it cannot contemplate God. When it has lost itself and everything in God, it finds itself again in God when it attains to the knowledge of Him, and it finds also everything which it had abandoned complete in God."

And:

"If the soul would know the real truth it must examine itself, whether it has withdrawn from all things, whether it has lost itself, whether it loves God purely with His love and nothing of its own at the same time, so that it may not be separated from Him by anything, and whether God alone dwells in it."

Once again it is brought to our attention how foreign the words of the ancient mystics are to our modern ears.

Whether or not one agrees with some, all, or none of their theology, one cannot help but see their selflessness. They understood what is was to deny oneself. There were no "self-esteem" issues with them, other than how to put oneself under the Cross and the Blood. Are there any today that could understand "self-mortification" without cringing as if a plague were being spoken of?

How far we have come. Not upwards towards heaven, but downward, within ourselves.

Thanks for this sermon post, dissidens.

PermalinkPermalink 07/11/05 @ 16:43
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 Comment from: dissidens [Member] Email
Indeed.

Because thou sayest, I am rich, and increased with goods, and have need of nothing; and knowest not that thou art wretched, and miserable, and poor, and blind, and naked ...
PermalinkPermalink 07/11/05 @ 17:41
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 Comment from: unk [Visitor]
Throw David Brainerd into that for good measure. Not that I shun the old mystics. But he's more recent and he'll still fit better than the modern prevailing notions.
PermalinkPermalink 07/12/05 @ 11:21
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 Comment from: dissidens [Member] Email
Well, the older ones have more heft, in my opinion, and they mark better the distance of our fall, but your point is taken.
PermalinkPermalink 07/12/05 @ 17:18
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 Comment from: unk [Visitor]
"they mark better the distance of our fall"

How is this? Brainerd seems more conscious of his depravity than any.
PermalinkPermalink 07/13/05 @ 06:57
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 Comment from: dissidens [Member] Email
Hmmm

I think there is more to be learned from the mystics than depravity-awareness, and I think that the more helpful mystics were pre-Enlightenment. That's not to fault guys like Brainerd. I just think the air is purer.
PermalinkPermalink 07/13/05 @ 07:36
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 Comment from: unk [Visitor]
I see. So you meant they tend to contrast better with us than anything since the enlightenment.
PermalinkPermalink 07/13/05 @ 10:32
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 Comment from: dissidens [Member] Email
Generally, yes.

Since the Enlightenment so much of mysticism is put into what I would call an unnatural conflict. Inevitable, but still unnatural.

Here I am not arguing for or against the rightness of the beliefs, whether Eckhart’s, Brainerd’s or ours, but the purer apprehension of the idea. How do we know that what we know is true? How do we test our knowledge of truth differently? Mysticism is not false just because it is unscientific.
PermalinkPermalink 07/13/05 @ 10:59
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 Comment from: unk [Visitor]
Are you familiar with this?

Hours with the Mystics
by Robert Alfred Vaughan

I'm wondering if it is worthwhile.
PermalinkPermalink 07/15/05 @ 07:06
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10 Comment from: dissidens [Member] Email
unk,

Can't say that I am.
PermalinkPermalink 07/15/05 @ 07:16
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Comments are closed for this post.

Remonstrans

July 2010
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 << <   > >>
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Archives

Search

Categories

XML Feeds

What is RSS?

Who's Online?

  • Guest Users: 44

powered by
b2evolution