banner

The Dog That Didn't Bark

02/22/08

Permalink 07:03:59 am, by dissidens Email , 384 words, 430 views   English (US)
Categories: Old Main

The Dog That Didn't Bark

We've been speaking again about the importance of criticism. We find ourselves listening to noise where there used to be music and doggerel where there is still at least the memory of a hymn, and we've been talking about people who still don't know the difference.

And along comes someone to offer the perfect example. Here is John Wilson (Christianity Today's idea of a critic) talking about Iron and Wine performing at Wheaton College. (Wheaton College, you will recall, was Mark Noll's reason for hope for the Evangelical mind.)

There will always be some who can't quite explain the difference between Garlock and Townend. It is for them that the critic exists. The critic does not exist to make an artist's career happen, he serves as a priest standing between the artist and the audience. Let us see if John Wilson is making an honest wage. Read this.

So what has John told us here?

He dithers about some unspecified similarity to Dylan, the Decemberists, Puerto Muerto and Calexico. Something happened in his ear, nothing, apparently, in his head. Or nothing he could articulate. It's just a list of performers like a bunch of numbered ping pong balls tumbling in a Plexiglas drum. Who knows? Who cares? What difference does it make? It's just the sort of argute perception he'll find useful at a CT cocktail party.

It would seem the noteworthy fact of the evening was the singer's refusal to comply with a request Mr. Wilson didn't feel was appropriate anyway. Then there was the riveting explanation of how he listens with his eyes closed. That pretty much put the whole soirée into perspective.

There is nothing here of intellectual interest, nothing of musical interest, and nothing of interest to the imagination. It was all about an evening out with Gary, Kathy, Daniel and Veronica and without Wendy. It was about some vague complaint against God. It was about thunderous applause for no reason he could discern.

As for the life of the mind, it's as though nothing happened at all and a lot of people clapped afterwards.

John ends by saying he couldn't join in but that he would keep listening.

Which is about right: listening without hearing, hearing without understanding, and sharing without communicating. No wonder reality catches him off-balance.

Trackback address for this post:

This is a captcha-picture. It is used to prevent mass-access by robots.

Please enter the characters from the image above. (case insensitive)

Comments, Trackbacks, Pingbacks:

1 Comment from: Observer [Visitor] Email
Excellent post!

Before reading Wilson's review, I knew nothing of Iron and Wine. After reading Wilson's review, I know nothing of Iron and Wine. He seems confused; I finished the article confused. Confusion all around.
PermalinkPermalink 02/22/08 @ 11:33

Reply to comment 4738 by Observer

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 Comment from: dissidens [Member] Email
See, this is exactly the problem.

With respect to our exchange, I’m not persuaded of your point: I don’t think someone with a high school education has any real problem ferreting out the obvious differences between the two songs I cited. But I didn’t ask you the question to take issue with you, so I’ll drop it. What I cannot drop is the obvious fact that the producers if not the consumers, the BJs, the Pensacolas, the Soundforths, the Pettits, the Herbsters, the Brookside Baptists, the Maranathas, the travelling Bible college drama troupes—these people certainly should know [they tell us they know], and they are treating the flock with the same dismissive arrogance of John Wilson. Just toss off some artsy-fartsy bafflegab to confuse the hayseeds and then sell them another CD.

I think this is a scandal. I don’t think it should be tolerated as ignorance; I think it should be confronted for the cultural degeneracy it is.

People ask what recourse there is? I think it starts right here: responsible critics and a conscientious audience. Not people who write anti rock-n-roll books and make cheeky guesses about tritones.

(And if you believe in the importance of the pastor/teacher in more than word only, is that not where this happens?)

Think about this contingency: suppose God were to send the church another Tersteegen or Luther? How would we know? Who would recognize him? Who would appreciate his art? How would he work his way up through this “industry”?
PermalinkPermalink 02/22/08 @ 12:54

Reply to comment 4739 by dissidens

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 Comment from: chris [Visitor] Email
It seems to me more like an Emperor's New Clothes scenario. With a few exceptions, the groups you listed primarily consist of people who from the time they were zygotes have been told that people who are right with God listen to smarmy, revivalistic music to keep their sanctification humming along on all four cylinders. It's the fourth member of the holy trinity of nomian righteousness: read your Bible, Pray, go to the altar once in a while, and listen to smarmy, revivalistic music. "The just shall live by..." reflexively nodding their heads.

Those are the observations of an amateur: I'm sure that at some level market forces are exerting significant torque towards sub-mediocrity, but that paints an awful bleak picture of the market.
PermalinkPermalink 02/22/08 @ 18:03

Reply to comment 4740 by chris

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 Comment from: dissidens [Member] Email
Yah, did you read about Puerto Muerto? Jus keepin it real, ain't they?

Wilson is a reggler ole Walter Pater.
PermalinkPermalink 02/22/08 @ 20:08

Reply to comment 4741 by dissidens

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 Comment from: chris [Visitor] Email
I'm sure he's well-paid for his insights, too. I wonder where they found him, and if heroin rehab is part of his benefits package from CT. On the other hand, if the fog were to lift, his obvious gifting would probably depart with it.

Walter Pater has nothing on Wilson. Wilson is like a Golden Retriever trying to solve a crossword puzzle, all meaningless and slobbery and cute. Pater knew how to read and stuff, and to splain what he read. That's no fun, it just makes the reality hangover worse.
PermalinkPermalink 02/23/08 @ 07:52

Reply to comment 4744 by chris

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 Comment from: dissidens [Member] Email
The evangelical mind is still a scandal.
PermalinkPermalink 02/23/08 @ 12:58

Reply to comment 4745 by dissidens

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 Comment from: Observer [Visitor] Email
"With respect to our exchange, I’m not persuaded of your point: I don’t think someone with a high school education has any real problem ferreting out the obvious differences between the two songs I cited. But I didn’t ask you the question to take issue with you, so I’ll drop it. What I cannot drop is the obvious fact that the producers if not the consumers . . ."

Two things. One, I think after reading and listening to either of those songs, most anyone would know there is a difference. But I'm not convinced that the same group would be able to substantiate the difference. They would say, "The music seems different, the lyrics seem different . . . but so what?" There is great apathy towards things of this nature. Unfortunately, that's the truth.

Two, I agree with your point. People putting out the music should be held to a higher standard. I don't want to use the term "brainwash," but when the aforementioned groups put these types of recordings out, the average lay person accepts them. And while they should be more critical and discerning, it does not help when the "authorities" put this stuff out. It's a bad state to be in.
PermalinkPermalink 02/24/08 @ 05:59

Reply to comment 4747 by Observer

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 Comment from: dissidens [Member] Email
That we agree on. The question is how.
PermalinkPermalink 02/25/08 @ 08:05

Reply to comment 4749 by dissidens

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.

Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small, a>
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email and url)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will NOT be displayed.))
This is a captcha-picture. It is used to prevent mass-access by robots.

Please enter the characters from the image above. (case insensitive)

Remonstrans

July 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 << <   > >>
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

Archives

Search

Categories

XML Feeds

What is RSS?

Who's Online?

  • Guest Users: 44

powered by
b2evolution