banner

The Man With The Big Stop Sign

02/29/08

Permalink 05:17:48 am, by dissidens Email , 338 words, 525 views   English (US)
Categories: Old Main

The Man With The Big Stop Sign

 

William F. Buckley, Jr.
1925-2008

 

Wednesday I heard the CNN TV announcer say "He used really big words", but coming from CNN, that could have referred to nearly anyone.

Bill Buckley was born four months and two weeks after the opening of the Scopes Trial into a time and place that had little regard for the permanent things and among people doing a spectacular job of abandoning the faiths. Mr. Buckley grew up to found a journal of opinion that obstructed and opposed the advance of disbelief.

He was a man of ideas and he loved to defend them; he obviously enjoyed the parry and thrust. He had wit, charm, and a darting tongue that may have been the last thing his opponents saw before their lights went out. He goaded the careless and scorned the gasbags and I loved watching it happen.

He founded that National Review which I read cover to cover every fortnight, he hosted Firing Line, which I watched every Sunday afternoon it was possible, and he wrote spy novels which I read occasionally. He also taught me the proper way to misuse commas.

But it was Bill Buckley and the cultured space he created that explained to me that my conservative temperament was intellectually defensible and morally obligatory.

He didn't use big words, he used right words. Nothing corrupts thought like imprecise language, and he was the perfect David for our Goliath.

Yesterday evening I got a brochure from a domestic cleaning service entitled: "Life's Too Short to Clean Your Own Home." Clearly this was the motto of the Western church I grew up in, and it was a divine grace that I learned outside church how stupid this policy is. Buckley distinguished between the idea of conservatism and the movement and he distanced conservatism from the weirdos, wackos, and witless opportunists that polluted the streams of thought.

We have lost a man who changed the world, and I hope Heaven has an Atlantic Ocean for him to play with.

Trackback address for this post:

This is a captcha-picture. It is used to prevent mass-access by robots.

Please enter the characters from the image above. (case insensitive)

Comments, Trackbacks, Pingbacks:

1 Comment from: Unk [Visitor] Email
It is amazing how much resistance--from friend as well as foe--there is to precise language. We tend to think that if one uses a word from our language we don't know, it is a joke or an imposition rather than a remediable patch of ignorance.
PermalinkPermalink 02/29/08 @ 06:11

Reply to comment 4756 by Unk

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 Comment from: Todd Mitchell [Visitor] Email · http://www.firstbaptistgranitefalls.org
I sure appreciated him when I was a kid debating policy in 1983-1984. Many times did I paste his quotes on 3 x 5 cards for ammunition.
PermalinkPermalink 02/29/08 @ 07:20

Reply to comment 4757 by Todd Mitchell

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 Comment from: danofsteel [Member] Email
I remember once on "Firing Line", Michael Kinsley criticized Bill Buckley for using big words. Mr. Buckley responded by explaining what an adze is (and listing a few different kinds). He then pointed out that if you want to say something about an adze it's far more efficient to use the word "adze" than to avoid the less familiar word by describing the tool in terms of the more familiar "axe."

Kinsley had no idea what Buckley was talking about, but I thought it a brilliant response to the "big words" accusation.

[My spell checker flags both adze and axe as misspelled. Go figger.]
PermalinkPermalink 02/29/08 @ 10:03

Reply to comment 4758 by danofsteel

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 Comment from: dissidens [Member] Email
Michael Kinsley is the whiningest political dork I know. Even when he moderated some Firing Line debates he came across as someone whose mother promised him a pudding pop after the show if he didn’t cry.

But yah, words are more important than we allow. The person with foul language is really saying, "I honestly cannot express myself, please accept these words as tokens of my frustration. I have nothing to offer beyond rage."

People who resent eloquence show, I think, awareness of guilt. Why would someone elect to use the wrong word?

And I think our children should be taught this; they should be encouraged to examine people’s statements:

Why would someone talk like that?
Why would someone use that word to describe this thing?
What assumption does his vocabulary betray?
What premises underlie that conclusion?
PermalinkPermalink 02/29/08 @ 13:42

Reply to comment 4759 by dissidens

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 Comment from: exlibris [Visitor] Email
"Buckley distinguished between the idea of conservatism and the movement and he distanced conservatism from the weirdos, wackos, and witless opportunists that polluted the streams of thought."

dissidens,

This concept bears a suspicious familiarity. Where might we have heard this before?

Were you tipping your hand?

Whatever, you intended to do. Buckley's approach was different from some within fundamentalism's pseudo-conservatism. When Buckley defended the idea of conservatism, he attacked those who claimed to be its only true adherents - the John Birch Society.

I will admit my own lack of decisiveness; you may prefer to say lack of obedience. For I vacillate between Buckley's approach and supporting a fundamentalism worth saving. Maybe we ought to ask if we have a fundamentalism that is beyond reformation. I'm almost sure that only a handful of churches, a few academics, and (of course) the libraries are worth saving. None dare call it treason.

Please forgive my impertinence at Mr. Buckley's wake. For what its worth, the day after his death, I found the darkest suit and the most subdued tie to wear into work. A great man had fallen. But, I suppose we will soon have people lamenting the fact that we offer so much honor to a Roman Catholic.

Now, onto less somber activity. I am listening to a newly acquired CD, Jubilation, produced by Parkening and Jubilant Sykes. Parkening's performance of "Koyunbaba" Op. 19 (the last track)is technically phenomenal! But that is just a windbag's opinion.
PermalinkPermalink 03/01/08 @ 15:43

Reply to comment 4760 by exlibris

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 Comment from: dissidens [Member] Email
Well, there’s more to it than just that, but I must admit that the whole conservative resurgence forced me to distinguish between essential differences and mere parochial loyalties gone to seed. I first grew up among simple people: they were profoundly informed by an old and serviceable tradition, but they didn’t come to it through the academy.

Then I went off to college to be assaulted by the whole Bob Jones/John Birch, Hall & Slater revisionism, the Webster’s 1828 Edition poppycock, the II Chronicles 7:14 abuse of Revelation….

So being confronted with Weaver, Kirk, Friedman, Kuehnelt-Leddihn…turned out to be the laying of the keel.
We share with the beasts a craving for sameness and a gregariousness which makes us desire the company of people of our own age, sex, race, creed, political conviction, class and taste. But it is exclusively human to have a thirst for diversity, i.e., to be happy in the company of those who are different from us in every respect, as well as to travel, to enjoy other foods, hear other tunes, see other plants, beasts, and landscapes. The delight in the variations of creation distinguishes man from beast as much as religion or reason.
It was pressed home to me that I found myself living amongst animals, and it became clear that they had a collar for me.

If I find a fundamentalism worth saving I may lift a finger to help. (But to be honest, I think my time would be better spent looking for a unicorn, Sasquatch, and the Holy Grail. Maybe there is an entry in the Encyclopedia Mythica under “A Fundamentalism Worth Saving”).

I did a quick search for the Parkening/Sykes but didn’t find any sound clips. I’ll check for the CD the next time I hit B&N.
PermalinkPermalink 03/01/08 @ 18:08

Reply to comment 4761 by dissidens

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.

Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small, a>
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email and url)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will NOT be displayed.))
This is a captcha-picture. It is used to prevent mass-access by robots.

Please enter the characters from the image above. (case insensitive)

Remonstrans

July 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 << <   > >>
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

Archives

Search

Categories

XML Feeds

What is RSS?

Who's Online?

  • Guest Users: 63

powered by
b2evolution