banner

On His Loneliness

07/18/08

Permalink 05:14:16 am, by dissidens Email , 510 words, 279 views   English (US)
Categories: Old Main

On His Loneliness

Little do men perceive what solitude is, and how far it extendeth.
For a crowd is not company, and faces are but a gallery of pictures,
and talk but a tinkling cymbal, where there is no love.

--- Francis Bacon

 

It probably should not surprise us that there is so much confusion and feckless speculation about Tozer's missing friends. Today people don't know what a friend is for: witness the babblers who tell us their wives are their best friends. No wonder their friendships are less durable than their marriages. Their marriages are no great shakes, but careers depend on a certain pretense. No one measures a man by the friends he abandons or the associations he plies.

"A principle fruit of friendship, is the ease and discharge of the fullness and swellings of the heart, which passions of all kinds do cause and induce." [Bacon, later in that same essay.] And with the low standing of friends in this society, it is not surprising that A. W. Tozer found himself alone.

But in addition to the discharge of the swellings of the heart, Bacon reminds those who know only the associations of convenience nurtured in the place of friendship that the joys of that discharge are doubled and the sorrows halved.

And beyond the fellowship of the affections, friendship is also "healthful for the understanding". When a man shares his thoughts with a friend, "he tosseth his thoughts more easily; he marshalleth them more orderly, he seeth how they look when they are turned into words: finally, he waxeth wiser than himself; and that more by an hour's discourse, than by a day's meditation."

Faithful are the wounds of a friend, but these wounds are generally not those we desire from our spouses.

"A man cannot speak to his son but as a father; to his wife but as a husband; to his enemy but upon terms: whereas a friend may speak as the case requires, and not as it sorteth with the person."

Bacon again.

I believe that what we find in Aiden Wilson Tozer is not just a perceptive and forthright man; we find in his personal life an evidence of the truth he speaks. The loneliness is not just a fact about Tozer, it is about the church Tozer found himself in. It is not that his peers were worse preachers. He claimed to be a poor preacher, and I accept his witness. What we see in Tozer is the sort of man who would cherish the truth when he found it and a man who could say it out loud. To the discomfort of those around him.

It should not surprise us that he found few who could be com-passionate. Who shared his passions?

Who shares them now? Even today, where is the Society of the Burning Heart one might suggest to discharge the fullness of the heart? Perhaps the most uncomfortable question is not how Tozer could be lonely but how it is that we are not?

Trackback address for this post:

This is a captcha-picture. It is used to prevent mass-access by robots.

Please enter the characters from the image above. (case insensitive)

Comments, Trackbacks, Pingbacks:

1 Comment from: David [Visitor] Email · http://hymnophile.wordpress.com/
"Better to have no friends and be an Elijah, alone, than to be like Lot in Sodom, surrounded by friends who all but damned him. If you give your cherished friendship to the ungodly counselor and the mocker, you have given the enemy the key to your heart. You have opened the gate, and the city of your soul will be overwhelmed and taken!" - Tragedy in the Church: The Missing Gifts
PermalinkPermalink 07/18/08 @ 05:37

Reply to comment 5340 by David

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 Comment from: dissidens [Member] Email
Which is very much the state we find ourselves in.
PermalinkPermalink 07/18/08 @ 05:54

Reply to comment 5341 by dissidens

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 Comment from: MAS [Visitor] Email · http://oldemike.blogspot.com
I give this a very articulate "Hm." I find that the real difficulty is found when among a group of Christians who do not visibly share such passions. Surrounded by dull, colorless, Christless conversation, it is easy to become pretentious; boredom and dissatisfaction can and often do breed self-righteousness. Preferring the company of some to others without creating an "us versus them" mentality takes work.
PermalinkPermalink 07/20/08 @ 14:08

Reply to comment 5342 by MAS

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 Comment from: MAS [Visitor] Email · http://oldemike.blogspot.com
Forget I wrote that first sentence - I meant to delete it
PermalinkPermalink 07/20/08 @ 14:09

Reply to comment 5343 by MAS

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 Comment from: WLJ [Visitor] Email · http://www.cogitavi.wordpress.com
I don't agree that a man can only speak to his wife but as a husband. Friendship and Eros can coexist as Lewis describes in The Four Loves. You can be lovers as well as joint seekers of the same God, the same beauty, and the same truth. Perhaps it is rare and perhaps the writer of the post was mocking the shallow views of marriage as well as friendship in our postmodern culture.
Sorry if I veered from the main thrust of the post, or if I misunderstood the point.
PermalinkPermalink 07/21/08 @ 06:35

Reply to comment 5344 by WLJ

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 Comment from: dissidens [Member] Email
I think Bacon’s point is correct. I don’t see eros and philia as incompatible either, but neither are they the same thing. That is Lewis’s point. He also illustrates the difference by imagining lovers facing each other in desire and friends as facing away toward a shared interest. The essence of the two is different but that doesn’t make them mutually exclusive.

But Bacon is still right. It is not that lovers can’t discuss the same things friends can discuss or pursue the same interests, (and it’s clear that some lovers can do it better than others) but it is still not quite the same thing. When a wife asks if that skirt makes her look fat or when she asks if you liked the meal she just spent four hours over, it’ll be clear pretty quickly that the answer very much “sorteth with the person”.

I don’t think this is an undesirable thing.

When I discuss something with a friend (and I hope one day to have one) I will value the contrary view expressed without regard for my feelings about it. However brilliant and insightful a lover may be, after 30 years together we’ve lost something of our disparate perceptions.
PermalinkPermalink 07/21/08 @ 08:09

Reply to comment 5345 by dissidens

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 Comment from: WLJ [Visitor] Email · http://www.cogitavi.wordpress.com
Right. I get it. They're not the same thing, but that doesn't make them completely incapable of dwelling in harmony. And clearly my relationship with my husband would be in grave jeopardy if he told me I looked fat in a skirt or if I told him I didn't like the flowers he brought home to me. In these situations Eros prevails over Philia and it should.


PermalinkPermalink 07/21/08 @ 12:21

Reply to comment 5348 by WLJ

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 Comment from: dissidens [Member] Email
Oh, no. I suppose we might say that “ideally” the two ought to go hand in hand as much as possible, although I’m disinclined to believe (or desire) that. I think this “ideal” would be a compromise slightly unsatisfactory in both respects.

If I want to haul gravel, I want a truck; if I want to cruise The Smokies, I want a sports car. I’m not sure “the-best-of-both-worlds” is all that attractive.
PermalinkPermalink 07/21/08 @ 12:45

Reply to comment 5349 by dissidens

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.

Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small, a>
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email and url)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will NOT be displayed.))
This is a captcha-picture. It is used to prevent mass-access by robots.

Please enter the characters from the image above. (case insensitive)

Remonstrans

December 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 << <   > >>
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      

Archives

Search

Categories

XML Feeds

What is RSS?

Who's Online?

  • Guest Users: 81

powered by
b2evolution