banner

Three Yahoos In Three Hats

07/21/08

Permalink 06:29:51 am, by dissidens Email , 1987 words, 1092 views   English (US)
Categories: Old Main

Three Yahoos In Three Hats

__________________________________________________________________________________________________

WARNING: The following post contains an accurate representation of emergents' words and ideas and therefore unavoidably constitutes an assault on proper sensibilities. Please exercise discretion before continuing.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

You might remember my visit to Journey Church.

We believe intentional communication with God through sacred acts of prayer, communion, worship, art, music, silence and meditation on Scripture is imperative to life with God.

The service I attended was a demonstration of signal incompetence in prayer, communion, worship, art, music, silence and meditation on Scripture. It was what I would call an experiment in Trinket Religion: shards of bumpkin piety strewn around to make deviant ex-evangelicals comfortable with an adolescent approximation of their parents' religion. It was to Christianity what Charlie Brown's Christmas tree and a plastic reindeer is to Advent.

Our task is not to seek full agreement on all things but to dialogue respectfully and listen for God's voice.

The comments that followed here on the blog were a fair example of Journey Church members' deep commitment to respect and dialogue. I was soon contacted privately by the she-pastor expressing regret over her members' behavior and she offered a nice apology. She also invited me to continue the conversation, but she suggested it not take place here on the blog.

Which was probably wise. The gist of the complaint from the journey-people was not that what I said was wrong; they merely took exception to my review because I hadn't asked them how they felt about their shards of bumpkin piety. I'm not sure she could have helped me there except perhaps to clean up the language a little bit.

Anyway, I dredge up these haunting memories because Journey Church and City Church here in the Metroplex hosted The Church Basement Roadshow: a kind of Special Olympics Revival/Book Tour/Halloween Ball. Devoted reader of emergentvillage.org that I am, I'd noted that they were coming to town and I posted July 18, 7:30 p.m. on my refrigerator. My birthday (and John Calvin's) eight days earlier passed unremembered and unremarked in my anticipation of the anointed hour.

We left the northeast corner of Dallas County for a southwest corner of Dallas with plenty of time; traffic was light and we got to the church early. We continued south on N. Zang Boulevard till we came to a Sonic. My wife likes Sonic and I figured something cheap, heavy and greasy in my stomach would aid in the evening's indigestion.

When we got back to the church we went through the doors crowded with some vaguely familiar faces and the she-pastor. I didn't see the money-bucket set out to collect the cover charge and I passed a table full of Bibles in a beeline for the men's room before I started shaking hands and leafing through books with my over-lubricated fingers. When I got to the men's room there was a guy in fire-engine red underwear. I didn't want to appear judgmental so I didn't snort, but I think he was donning red longjohns because he was suiting up to be a barefoot, red longjohn-wearing usher. I was tempted to ask him how he felt about wearing red longjohns in a religious service, but I decided not to.

I came out and wandered the building as I always do, checking for evidences of religious sensibilities. I went back to the auditorium and found my wife seated, fanning herself with one of those funeral home fans depicting a bearded woman holding a long pole and a lamb. On the back was the url for Wesley Theological Seminary. I gave my wife a disapproving look and remembered the ten buck cover charge, so I went back to the foyer and dropped a $20 bill in the bucket to help defray the costs of such mindless extravagance. With rampant global poverty and children all over the world starving, this is the best stewardship....

One of the things included in the handout packet was a bumper sticker that said, IF YOU LOVE THE CREATOR, TAKE CARE OF CREATION. I told my wife I thought I had time to go out and put it on her car and she gave me a disapproving look. Disapproving looks always provoke second thoughts so I wondered if it might be better to stick it on the bumper of the gas-guzzling, ozone-depleting assault on the creation Pagitt, Jones and Scandrette drive around in. I bet they even use the air-conditioner. Obviously their eschatological hope is a major rip-off.

On the screen was a powerpoint presentation of useless trivia circa 1908. I was reminded that in 1908 the Olympics were held in London.

Seven-thirty came and went and the show hadn't started so I wandered back to check out the book table and see if the "Trucker Frank for President" t-shirt came in my size.

Alas.

Finally the she-pastor, dressed all like a prairie maiden, mounted the stage and announced the beginning of the revival. What followed was a lot of what people in 1908 would have called blasphemy. Three intellectually challenged hayseeds laughing, posing and shouting Hallelujah and Yahweh in mock prayer and praise.

Doug Pagitt does not play the trombone, but he does hold it up to his lips and he works the slide.

He carries a slide whistle in his pocket as well and occasionally pulls it out to play a sound effect for giggles. Clearly he has dedicated himself to the art of the slide whistle and only switched to the trombone so he could move from the percussion section to the brass section. Scandrette is a washboard virtuoso.

They opened the show by declaring that Plato and Socrates were not worth following but that Jesus was. Plato was all about nous, and clearly these prairie frauds wanted to have nothing to do with nous.

I'll spare you the blow-by-blow, but each one got up and read from his book.

Scandrette warned us that what he had to say was perhaps not as polite as we were accustomed to, and he said that the church had been all "effed up". He told us all about Emperor Arcadia [pictured here] and an early conversation wherein the Emperor reveals:

"I HAVE BEEN CONDUCTING EXPERIMENTS ON MYSELF FOR 30 YEARS-EXPLORING THE MYSTERIES OF CHEMISTRY AND HEALTH. MY PRESCRIPTION: EAT A CLOVE OF GARLIC AND DRINK YOUR OWN URINE AND SEMEN TWICE A DAY."

Scandrette went on reading from his book and making about as much sense as the Emperor, and he summed up his chapter (and ministry) with this:

By telling this story I'm not suggesting that everyone could or should make friends with someone like the emperor. What I do know is that I feel alive when I am testing the limits of my own boundaries- finding a source of love that is greater than my own and discovering beauty in unexpected places.

He closed with some doggerel of his own invention which was rather pathetic to hear. It was like a pre-adolescent who'd just read Howl and thought he could do something similar with the right thesaurus.

Go ye into all the world and feel alive testing the limits of your own boundaries and find a love greater than your own.

Discovering beauty in unexpected places was a gift I sorely coveted there on July 18th at 7:30 p.m.

Scandrette was just a daffy mid-westerner who found fulfillment rubbing shoulders with perverts and degenerates and claiming to be a follower of the One who forgave sinners and told them to go and sin no more, but Jones and Pagitt were priceless.

Pagitt had a profound experience at a passion play but was turned off to the church as a result of some follow-up work which involved evangelical illustrations of salvation. In particular there was a cartoon of a chasm between man and God and a cross which bridged the gap. This puzzled poor Dougie because he'd seen a play that suggested there was no gap between man and God. There was that and there was the heroic image he had of Billy Jack.

Tony Jones is similarly confused. He grew up in what he calls a "mainline church" and ran afoul of some evangelicals during his college years. It was not a happy experience. Evangelicals talked about "unbelievers", a term he couldn't understand in spite of the fact that the library had a dictionary that could help him with words like that. But Tony is not what we would call a scholar: remember that he divided up American Christianity into mainline and snake-handlers. Tony doesn't even know what the term "born again" means.

Tony was also annoyed that these evangelicals inquired after his "QT".

Now I say all this not to embarrass these three mid-western wannabe showfolk. I have read their books, listened to Pagitt on radio interviews, watched Jones on TV shows, and now I've seen their road act. These men clearly cannot be embarrassed.

What is important to take from these charlatans is the fact that they are illiterates who cannot make a philosophical argument (as demonstrated by Jones in his book) and they cannot make a theological case (as Pagitt has shown). And when they get an opportunity to explain their "reformation" in a way that suits their inabilities, in a way unencumbered by reason, literacy, argument, nous or logic, this is what they say.

And this is quite remarkable. Surely it should be rather easy to bring a case against the smarmy, unnuanced, saccharine oversimplifications of American evangelicalism! I mean that can be done by people who have to take lessons in how to fall off a log!

Tony Jones is in college and he doesn't know what grace means. He never learned this in his mainline church, he never consulted a lexicon, a theological dictionary or a concordance, so he asked an evangelical. The evangelical pulls out a pen and makes as though it were a gift. He tells Tony that grace is like an offer of a gift which requires nothing but acceptance. Tony leaves this conversation with the understanding that the story was intended to illustrate the cross. How, he asks, can we equate the central image, the defining event of Christianity with a pen? Tony hadn't yet grasped the purpose of a metaphor. I don't think he has learned since.

This is why emergents have issues with nous and why they are no friends of Plato.

So when you cast your mind back to Marie's experience of being shunned at church because she passed out in the school parking lot trying to get high, and when you recall her conclusion that therefore God cannot be known, you are not looking at a poor example of human reasoning, you are looking at the genius of Emergence.

This explains Tony Jones's confusion about what it means to be born again. It's not that Jones can construct an argument against the new birth from what Jesus actually said or what the Church subsequently taught; all Jones can do is raise the pathetic image of a child being manipulated by the light of a campfire.

This is the ethos of the movement. This is the vibe: adolescent irreverence excusing itself by pointing to painful personal experience.

They had the stage for two hours. There were no songs of Zion, no poetry readings, no gripping monologues, no Chautauqua-like lectures...just self-indulgent bumpkins laughing at what they don't understand and playing to the popular resentments of a degenerate crowd.

This revival had no altar call, of course, but an offering was taken. This move of the spirit is not about repentance and restoration, it is about self-promotion and collecting money. There's a cover charge because it is a show, and there is an offering because it is a show about religion.

Blasphemy, entertainment and greed, these three, but the greatest of these is greed.

Trackback address for this post:

This is a captcha-picture. It is used to prevent mass-access by robots.

Please enter the characters from the image above. (case insensitive)

Comments, Trackbacks, Pingbacks:

1 Comment from: Walter [Visitor] Email
You are a braver man than I to sit through something like that start to finish.

I trust you showered well when you returned to your home that evening.

Can you describe the audience? Where the attendees largely people who are on the fence - perhaps genuinely questioning things, or people that have already bought in to such nonsense, or ....?

PermalinkPermalink 07/21/08 @ 09:51

Reply to comment 5346 by Walter

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 Comment from: dissidens [Member] Email
Walter:

I did shower and I used a wire brush. My wife helped get my back clean with a paint scraper and her crème brûlée torch.

Thanks for asking.

As for the audience, I wish I could give a satisfactory answer to that question. I very casually counted 65-70; my wife counted at a different time and got 75-80. Her number is probably closer because I counted when a number of people were in transit.

There was a representative contingent from Journey Church, whether there was from the City Church I cannot say; I never visited there. Just based on a) those I did recognize from Journey, b) the sort of loud parking lot conversations that helped identify groups of people as supporters, friends and acquaintances, and c) the sorts of crowds typically seen on their advertising material, I could be forgiven for supposing that if you subtracted all those with connections to the churches and the performers themselves, you could not have filled a short schoolbus. Perhaps not even an airport shuttle.

I’m sure the emergents would dispute this. I thought about asking the she-pastor or her husband, but what these people say about truth doesn’t encourage me to go around asking a lot of questions. I think these people care less about objective numbers and more about how they feel about numbers. So maybe they would take my subjective perceptions as reliable? Who knows.

It is possible to be a bit more confident when it comes to the sort of people emergents have in tow. This group was just as homogenous as one would expect. There was one mulatto child (whose mother I recall from Journey Church). This accurately represents their racial diversity. You will see far more racial diversity in the choirs of Thomas Road Baptist Church or Pensacola Christian College’s Campus Church. Compared to the emergent church, fundamentalists look as diverse as the opening ceremonies of the Olympics.

But what is clearest is the audience the emergents aim at. Clearly they are not reaching what evangelicals call the unsaved, unbelievers or the unchurched. The consistent message is not the content of the gospel—or even the “kingdom”; they aim at the malcontents of a disintegrating neo-evangelical and charismatic sub-culture. People who want to hear that the church “effed up”. There are a lot of moms out there who don’t want their younguns studying ecclesiology with emergents.

Look at their own Trucker Frank webisodes: http://www.youtube.com/user/newchristians and you will get a sense of their target audience.

I would like to have stayed for the post-show slurp-n-burp, but my wife informed me when I sat down that one of the entryway hostesses was letting word out who I was and telling everyone that when I visited Journey Church I “came with a clipboard and everything!” Friday night I’d brought a legal pad and I doubt I would have gotten much assistance. These people are all for “asking hard questions” and “challenging assumptions” but that’s a one-way street. I might as well have worn a yarmulke to a Klan Rally.
PermalinkPermalink 07/21/08 @ 11:56

Reply to comment 5347 by dissidens

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 Comment from: Kai [Visitor] Email · http://kaischraml.wordpress.com/
Brother, there is no love in your tone.

If your statement, "This is the ethos of the movement. This is the vibe: adolescent irreverence excusing itself by pointing to painful personal experience." is accurate--then I can only surmise that they came to such a place through experiences similar to reading your note about them.

You fail to turn them back to what you perceive to be the correct path (I am not endorsing or rebutting your position) because of this.
PermalinkPermalink 07/21/08 @ 14:00

Reply to comment 5350 by Kai

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 Comment from: Steve K. [Visitor] Email · http://www.knightopia.com/journal
Sorry, you lost me at "she-pastor." And not because I'm a stupid, confused Emergent (as you make us all out to be with your broad brush strokes).

Like Kai said, where's the Christ-like love? If Emergent is your enemy, then do what Christ said and love your enemies. Love requires offering a serious critique, not this stuff. You actually have to care about the people you are offering your critique to, even the "she-pastor."
PermalinkPermalink 07/21/08 @ 17:24

Reply to comment 5351 by Steve K.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 Comment from: MAS [Visitor] Email
'scuse me, fellas.

Would you mind explaining Paul's definition of Christian love from Galatians 5:12?

How about you expound a few of Christ's scathing rebukes of the Pharisees, His cleverly biting wordplays, His vilifying of those self-righteous villains?

Don't be a tool, man. Stop getting so squeamish every time somebody offers a colorful critique. We're adults; Big People use Big People tools like sarcasm to get a point across. If you want to stay at home playing with Little Tyke plastic screwdrivers, that's your business, but don't go getting all whiny over a blogger just because he has some rhetorical bite.

Sheesh.
PermalinkPermalink 07/21/08 @ 18:40

Reply to comment 5352 by MAS

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 Comment from: dissidens [Member] Email


Hey, guys. Thanks for dropping by and sharing your feelings with us.

There’s really not much help I can offer until you read the New Testament, and since that isn’t likely to happen soon, I fear any examples I would cite from it will strike you as implausible and exaggerated.

MAS has dropped a few hints an A-student might pick up on.

Do you guys know any A-students?

PermalinkPermalink 07/21/08 @ 20:06

Reply to comment 5353 by dissidens

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 Comment from: threegirldad [Visitor] Email
WARNING: The following post contains an accurate representation of emergents' words and ideas and therefore unavoidably constitutes an assault on proper sensibilities.

That does it! I'm sending you the bill for my new monitor and keyboard.

;-)
PermalinkPermalink 07/21/08 @ 21:39

Reply to comment 5354 by threegirldad

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 Comment from: dissidens [Member] Email
Yeah, about that: our lawyers (Moore, Lize & Devaltree) say we don’t have to pay for stuff you break, especially since we posted a warning.

Sorry.

; )

PermalinkPermalink 07/22/08 @ 07:47

Reply to comment 5355 by dissidens

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 Comment from: WLJ [Visitor] Email · http://www.cogitavi.wordpress.com
How sad that the autonomous self seems to be the only center upon which any of their so-called Christian experiences flow. That God stands outside of them and is known through Scripture and in the Incarnate Son does not seem to occur. This is no more than rebellion against God's revealed truth and no bad past encounters with evangelicalism excuse it.

What a way to spend your birthday! I spent mine in the hospital this summer, but I think this would have been more depressing!
PermalinkPermalink 07/22/08 @ 08:45

Reply to comment 5356 by WLJ

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10 Comment from: dissidens [Member] Email
Ouch!

Sorry about your stint in the hospital.

Actually, I thought the Roadshow was funny. Not amusing, not enjoyable, but ironically twisted. Here you have guys professing a church, a gospel for the postmodern, but when these guys write a book or put together a program, they are not talking about a real philosophy, they are not understanding a real history, and they are not pursuing a real Christianity. They are venting about evangelical aberrations and sub-cultural anachronisms; they are venting their resentments over experiences no postmodern could appreciate or internalize.

All they have done is paste on a bit of smarmy environmentalism, chic global samaritanism, zombie liberalism, campus anti-americanism to give the illusion of relevance.

Doubt me?

This is what Mark Scandrette himself wrote:

http://blog.beliefnet.com/churchbasementroadshow/2008/07/kitsh-camp-becomes-real-reviva.html

After learning that we dress up as old-timey revivalists for the Church Basement Roadshow, some have supposed that we are making fun of American religious tradition. This could not be further from the truth. Many who have attended the our [sic] Rollin' Gospel Revival have been impressed with its surprising sincerity. On this tour we are discovering how well irony plays to an audience that is skeptical about direct marketing and fatigued by overly wrought manipulative messaging. At our shows we invite the audience to shout, "Hallelujah" "Glory" or "Amen" along with our 1908 characters preaching and singing revival songs in wool frock suits. People who might never otherwise be so demonstrative in their religious affections are remarkably and genuinely moved by our mock revival. Perhaps irony and camp are the means by which the Spirit touches a generation of hipsters-- and in some strange way kitsch camp becomes real revival.
You gotta laugh.

“…our mock revival."

We have seen in the past what followed real revivals and awakenings. Let us mark our calendars and a year from now we’ll compare results.


PermalinkPermalink 07/22/08 @ 16:13

Reply to comment 5357 by dissidens

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
11 Comment from: chris [Visitor] Email
Diss,

Good point: the Evangelical Revival sorta changed the world a bit. I wonder what the Evangelical Revival would look like through the eyes of an Emergent. Probably the same as it looked to a Nineteenth Century brothel keeper?
PermalinkPermalink 07/22/08 @ 19:39

Reply to comment 5358 by chris

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12 Comment from: dissidens [Member] Email
I suspect the emergent doesn’t have the refined sensibilities of a 19th C. brothel keeper.
PermalinkPermalink 07/23/08 @ 13:04

Reply to comment 5359 by dissidens

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
13 Comment from: Jim W [Visitor] Email
I read this about the road show and possibly sad to say, wasn't surprised by the hogwash that Jones and Pagitt can produce. I went over to the third stooge's entry about his friend, the Emperor. After reading it, I left a comment to the effect that all his nice works and friendship didn't mean a thing if he never introduced the Emp to the real Jesus and explained what Jesus Christ did for him (and all of us). I notice that now that comment is gone. I rather expected that.
PermalinkPermalink 07/24/08 @ 15:12

Reply to comment 5360 by Jim W

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
14 Comment from: dissidens [Member] Email
I’m not too surprised.

These ladies are so busy posing in their PC bonnets and parasols they can’t be troubled to understand (or share) the Gospel of the Apostles and martyrs…they just want to ingratiate themselves with the despisers of the church, or, as they put it, the “church”.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1KZRzMt-gSA

They can dish it out but they can’t take it.
PermalinkPermalink 07/24/08 @ 16:19

Reply to comment 5361 by dissidens

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
15 Comment from: Michael [Visitor] Email
Always good to see the clipboard.

Any thoughts on Compassion International??

I thought Scandrette looked a little like Bono.

PermalinkPermalink 07/28/08 @ 09:00

Reply to comment 5370 by Michael

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
16 Comment from: dissidens [Member] Email
Clipboards are good. They are useful for recording facts and an excellent way to document how I feel about things.

Compassion International looks like a first-class scam. Whenever I want a picture of a pathetic dark-skinned child, compassion.com is the first place I go. CI is also a great way for Christian artists to pose for the cameras and advance their careers.

What could be better than that?
PermalinkPermalink 07/28/08 @ 10:09

Reply to comment 5371 by dissidens

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.

Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small, a>
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email and url)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will NOT be displayed.))
This is a captcha-picture. It is used to prevent mass-access by robots.

Please enter the characters from the image above. (case insensitive)

Remonstrans

November 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 << <   > >>
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30            

Archives