banner

Everything And This And That

11/03/08

Permalink 05:12:02 am, by dissidens Email , 598 words, 2176 views   English (US)
Categories: Old Main

Everything And This And That

As many of you have recently learned, this is the 21st Century. Plato has died. Aristotle has died. St. Augustine has died. Our ideas have changed and truth no longer exists in any useful sense, so we must re-think, re-imagine, re-guess and re-suppose a lot of fairly important things.

This should be done, if at all possible, on couches in a building that used to be a church. If you don't have a couch or a church or if you are a wizard of (post)modern technology, you do it on the internet. Here is a little piece of this great work in progress. This is Doug, Sven and ChumChum doing theology with the tools of pre-industrial society, the pick and shovel.

(Bear with the "conversation". This is only the sixth week of Doug's ACWB book club and some of the technical problems need to be ironed out. The philosophical problems seem to be, how shall we say, somewhat intractable.)

ChumChum:

"Ok, so here's what I'm proposing: the idea of God being in us, God being with us, God being involved intimately with the creation sustaining it does not exclude for him to be outside of the creation at the same time...here's the thing, here's how I look at it; I think the biblical view from the creation, from the story of Eden, we have a God that is here involved, you know, with us, not removed. And I think what happened is that somehow we came up with this idea of a God that is out there because from a philosophical perspective we cannot make sense that you know God can create the universe, create all this thing if he is part of it in the sense that of being intimately involved. So for me it is very clear that this is something we came up with on I don't know coming to grips with something that I don't know God is the creator. In other words I think this is just our own way of making sense of the idea that God is the one that created everything and this and that.

"So but that's an addition, it's a later kind of a thought that comes to the equation. But the reality is that throughout the Bible, the first thing that comes to mind is the fact that God is here very, very intimately involved with the creation, with you know with creation as far as human beings so what I am saying is for us to accept this idea that it is a must, that it is an idea of a God that is transcendent and then so forth. It's more of a philosophical category, not so much of a biblical theology that comes from just what how we know God through the Bible."

Pagitt:

"Yah, I think you've really hit it there."

He's no doubt hit something; my first guess is that it was a gas main.

It seems there may be some grounds for the fear that theology cannot be understood by the present generation.

The session ended with the appropriate seasonal wishes, and it was upon hearing "Happy Halloween" that it struck me that this was all a Halloween prank. This discussion was a way to soap the Reformers' windows, as it were. I also think Doug and Sven and ChumChum wanted some candy.

If you would like to send some candy to the ACWB Book Club, please address all parcels to:

ACWB Book Club
c/o Solomon's Porch
100 W. 46th Street
Minneapolis, MN 55419

 

Trackback address for this post:

This is a captcha-picture. It is used to prevent mass-access by robots.

Please enter the characters from the image above. (case insensitive)

Comments, Trackbacks, Pingbacks:

1 Comment from: Pseudonymous-of-Late [Visitor] Email
"Here's what I'm proposing..."

*silence*

"Yah, you've really hit it there..."
PermalinkPermalink 11/03/08 @ 06:37

Reply to comment 5637 by Pseudonymous-of-Late

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 Comment from: exlibris [Visitor] Email
substitute "nonsense" for "silence" and I think you've really hit it, Pseudo.

diss,

In a way I sort of sympathize with their plight. They come from generations that, on the whole, eschewed intellectual vitality, preferring instead the laziness of the MTV, video game, CNN, NFL sewers. For about 20 years nobody read a book - then the Internet hit. Modernity collapsed and many began to read and experience the byzantine conversation that often accompanies error (you know the sort of essay answer you get from some Freshman who partied, but didn't study those notes on the English Civil War). Now, suddenly, they need to live life with its responsibilities, and their whole life is like this rambling essay, you know, because they were like sleeping through class.

Anything is okay, provided they demonstrate to those reading that they are not comatose. My question is why are academic elites now aiding and abetting this scandal? They read and write in ever copious quantities just to obfuscate both questions and answers.
PermalinkPermalink 11/03/08 @ 07:55

Reply to comment 5638 by exlibris

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 Comment from: dissidens [Member] Email
ex:

True; certainly their forebears were not the sharpest pencils in the book bag, but still, it takes a fair amount of time sweating in the weight room and a lot of individual perseverance to achieve this lack of sophistication. I suspect Tony’s been heard to say “FEEL THE BURN!”

Here’s Tony Jones, erstwhile national coordinator of emergentvillage:
…correspondence came from a friend who is also an academic, and she challenged the lack of sophistication in my post, saying that I was slinging around terminology in a sloppy manner. In an email response I agreed, and then went on to say that blogging is a medium that is different-in-kind than the kind of work she’s used to doing. I then joked that I hoped she wouldn’t have the same criticism of my dissertation!
Ooooo, Dissertation!

Can’t wait for that!

But I do agree that schools have not taken the hit they deserve. I keep coming back to Machen and his warning about prior conditions.

What remains to be discovered is whether the church will ever get those “men of another type” that Machen looked for, men of thought, men contemptuous of false ideas, men who have a care for the prior conditions of the human mind.

It takes a certain amount of chutzpah to call this a Christianity worth believing.

PermalinkPermalink 11/03/08 @ 10:21

Reply to comment 5639 by dissidens

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 Comment from: Pseudonymous-of-Late [Visitor] Email
Well, I thought "flatulence" was a bit strong.

You employ an interesting diagnosis and parallel. The children of the MTV generation have categorically discarded most pretenses of civility. I wonder what their kids and/or the second generations of these "churches" will look like in twenty years. Quite possibly both will have forsaken the pretense of "A Christianity worth publishing through Zondervan" and moved on to better parties.
PermalinkPermalink 11/03/08 @ 10:42

Reply to comment 5640 by Pseudonymous-of-Late

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 Comment from: Doug PAgitt [Visitor] Email
Another day well spent my friends. ;0)
I wonder if you feel good going to bed at night that you have really contributed good things to the world?

The candy address is not the best one for packages - try this
PO Box 24361
Minneapolis, MN 55424
PermalinkPermalink 11/04/08 @ 06:05

Reply to comment 5641 by Doug PAgitt

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 Comment from: dissidens [Member] Email

Well, of course I can’t speak for everyone; speaking only for myself, I felt pretty good.

I woke up, oh, right around 2 a.m. with what I call a “laughing nightmare” about some ADHD heretics extruding some deep thoughts on total depravity. My wife rolled over and asked, “Doug Pagitt again?”

“Yes,” I told her, “I wish I could d/l it to your ipod.”

Then I must have fallen back asleep.

As for the larger question about going to bed feeling I have “contributed good things to the world”, I’m wondering if you could define “good” without getting all platonic on us?
PermalinkPermalink 11/04/08 @ 06:33

Reply to comment 5642 by dissidens

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 Comment from: Todd Mitchell [Visitor] Email · http://www.firstbaptistgranitefalls.org
Yes, Doug, what do you mean by "good?"
PermalinkPermalink 11/04/08 @ 07:59

Reply to comment 5643 by Todd Mitchell

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 Comment from: exlibris [Visitor] Email
PAgitt's tripe is all so typical of the movement.

Ask serious questions. Call into question their grasp of the question, let alone their answers, and they pull this childish "you've been wasting your time" routine.

Hubris, subterfuge, and avoiding the issue are their only defense. They are not being serious. They are anesthetizing cancer patients without sending them to a doctor that can help them. This is not responsible. When you question their practices, they question your use of time.

All the while, Mr. PAgitt, has money left over to go to France. Charlatans usually make out quite well.

Does Dante have a special level in the Inferno for PAgitt and his ilk? As I recall, the prophets of the Older Testament had a special anathema for false prophets who assuaged people of the guilt and the terror of an impending judgment by God because of their sin.

This is just more proof that we are not ushering in the kingdom, but rather, the world is going to hell in a hand basket. The likes of PAgitt are coaxing them into that hand basket.
PermalinkPermalink 11/04/08 @ 09:37

Reply to comment 5644 by exlibris

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 Comment from: Pseudonymous-of-Late [Visitor] Email
Doug,

If I send candy to that address, it will reach a starving child or a homeless victim of capitalism somewhere, won't it?

I'd feel better knowing that my resources were in good hands and making a difference.
PermalinkPermalink 11/04/08 @ 15:27

Reply to comment 5645 by Pseudonymous-of-Late

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10 Comment from: dissidens [Member] Email

exlibris:

Well, seriousness has taken a heartless beating in all segments of American Christianity. This just is not a good hair day for theology.

Dante?

Who’s Dante, some Platonist fantasy writer? And has he really contributed any good things to the world?

PermalinkPermalink 11/04/08 @ 16:47

Reply to comment 5646 by dissidens

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
11 Comment from: Mountain [Visitor] Email
I couldn't really make out what exactly he was trying to say. But sounded somewhat like classical Christian Liberalism, except that Liberals expressed themselves better.

Liberalism is so 70 years ago. These cutting-edge guys are about three generations behind the times.
PermalinkPermalink 11/05/08 @ 06:13

Reply to comment 5647 by Mountain

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12 Comment from: dissidens [Member] Email

I take your point, but I don’t call them Liberals. What Machen admired in his German teachers--and I am forced to accept his observations—was a principled (misguided but earnest) attempt to preserve Christianity for the modern world. By the time I came along…a good bit later…no one was speaking so well of them. I never had an independent perception of that world.

So while emergents have swallowed the liberal political agenda hook, line and sinker, and while there is a superficial resemblance, I think there is enough of a distinction that I don’t call them liberals. They are the toe jam of liberalism. They are a) unprincipled and b) unlearned. The closest I can come is Zombie Liberal: a dead ideal revived by sorcery.

Go to any of the sites where emergents exhibit the results of their thinking and you really do find ignoramuses spouting piffle. Whether they are talking church history, theology, philosophy, ecclesiology, aesthetics…doesn’t matter, they are vomiting up what no one really believes, only what they think ought to be believed.

They don’t care for the poor, they want to be seen as “sensitive to poverty”. They don’t want people to be fed, they want to redistribute wealth. They even have a phrase: “Make Affluence History”.

As much as I hate liberalism, that ain’t liberalism.


PermalinkPermalink 11/05/08 @ 08:10

Reply to comment 5648 by dissidens

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
13 Comment from: Neoclassical [Visitor] Email
PermalinkPermalink 11/05/08 @ 08:27

Reply to comment 5649 by Neoclassical

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
14 Comment from: Mountain [Visitor] Email
What Machen admired in his German teachers--and I am forced to accept his observations—was a principled (misguided but earnest) attempt to preserve Christianity for the modern world.

The Emerging Church people claim they're trying to preserve Christianity for the postmodern world. It's easier to take Modernists seriously because they express themselves better.
PermalinkPermalink 11/05/08 @ 13:35

Reply to comment 5650 by Mountain

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
15 Comment from: dissidens [Member] Email

Yep. Who wants to be eloquent when one can just “give it a whoop and a push”?

Eloquence is hard.

Which reminds me. Their schtick bombed at the National Youth Workers Convention, which I would think has to be quite a trick. Tony says “the irony was lost on the crowd.”

Really?! And such a discriminating crowd it was.

PermalinkPermalink 11/05/08 @ 17:04

Reply to comment 5651 by dissidens

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.

Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small, a>
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email and url)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will NOT be displayed.))
This is a captcha-picture. It is used to prevent mass-access by robots.

Please enter the characters from the image above. (case insensitive)

Remonstrans

September 2010
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 << <   > >>
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30    

Archives

Search

Categories

XML Feeds

What is RSS?

Who's Online?

  • Guest Users: 42

powered by
b2evolution