banner

Perdurance

02/09/09

Permalink 06:15:44 am, by dissidens Email , 482 words, 995 views   English (US)
Categories: Old Main

Perdurance

For those of you who haven't been following the fortunes of the emergent church, you might want to give this a listen. But do pay attention, there's a lot of english on the ball. (You know the emergent church has already given up when its spokesblokes tell you it "is not giving up." I believe this is the moment the coroner hangs the toe tag on the corpse.)

More opinions can be found thither and yon. Most are amusing, but all are instructive. It's become the story of the incredible imploding deconstruction crew. It would be funny on its own merits, but on its own merits the part is not as informative as the whole. It was like watching a bunch of hippies trying to set up NASA. Nothing's been properly deconstructed yet, and what sprouted as an emergence has turned into a departure.

What began as a vibe, an ethos, a website, and a few cheesy YouTube videos has become a comical collection of knit caps and soul patches pretending to understand biblical narrative. Incidentally, if you want to sample their exegetical skills, read this.

I think for many of us we read the scriptures and pass over verses and sometimes whole chapters and not realize the explicit graphic sexual and violent content that is found within them. With the help of Queer Theory and a bit of Poststructrualist pizzazz, I seek to disrupt a normal reading of Revelation 17 as an attempt to bring about more dialogue and to help others to see the divinely inspired horror that lies within some of our sacred biblical passages.

Particularly entertaining is the complaint—I think it was from Tony—that, having refused to define themselves they can now complain that their opponents misrepresented their positions. Gotta tellya, that's about as poignant as a rubber crutch.

And we hear again the claim that it is not about the movement, it is about the idea.

Here we had a media fad, a collection of couches, some very stale philosophical pretentions, some wobbly insights into the doing of "deep church", and an open source theology...until differences of opinion began cropping up; then it started looking like a bunch of Baptist women arguing over whose TupperwareTM it is.

But we should not be amused for long. Something new is coming and I'm sure everyone will again focus on the silly novelties and overlook the significant continuities in American evangelicalism. From fundamentalism's Billy Sunday side-show heyday, through evangelicalism's crazyquilt of agendas and programs to emergents' open-source apostasy, there is one line that haunts them all:

Despite all we can do, the desire to know and the love of beauty cannot be entirely stifled, and we cannot permanently regard these desires as evil.

There is a relationship between knowledge and piety that bears a second look.

Somebody really should get started on that, y'know.

Trackback address for this post:

This is a captcha-picture. It is used to prevent mass-access by robots.

Please enter the characters from the image above. (case insensitive)

Comments, Trackbacks, Pingbacks:

1 Comment from: exlibris [Visitor] Email
With the help of Queer Theory and a bit of Poststructrualist pizzazz . . .

i.e. "I'm gonna make this text say any blankety-blank thing I want it to say . . ."

Sorry about the junior driscollism.
PermalinkPermalink 02/09/09 @ 14:30

Reply to comment 5937 by exlibris

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 Comment from: dissidens [Member] Email

Yah, Mark Karris is clearly one disturbed dude. But as twisted as his imagination is, he has done nothing but apply the theories of Emergence. He may not be as literate as a junior college graduate, but he hasn’t done anything an emergent could say crosses a line.

It’s all very ironic.
PermalinkPermalink 02/09/09 @ 18:17

Reply to comment 5938 by dissidens

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 Comment from: andrew [Visitor] Email · http://tallskinnykiwi.typepad.com
where is my soulpatch when i need it? oh yeah - i shaved it off in 1993 when it was trendy.

names and trends come and go but God's work goes on.
PermalinkPermalink 02/11/09 @ 11:40

Reply to comment 5943 by andrew

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 Comment from: dissidens [Member] Email

AJ:

Yah? Good on ya for losing the patch. Now trash the silly hat.

And do let me know if you need more candles down there.

PermalinkPermalink 02/11/09 @ 13:06

Reply to comment 5944 by dissidens

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.

Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small, a>
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email and url)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will NOT be displayed.))
This is a captcha-picture. It is used to prevent mass-access by robots.

Please enter the characters from the image above. (case insensitive)

Remonstrans

September 2010
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 << <   > >>
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30    

Archives

Search

Categories

XML Feeds

What is RSS?

Who's Online?

  • Guest Users: 43

powered by
b2evolution