banner

Quadrennial

03/20/09

Permalink 06:29:50 am, by dissidens Email , 436 words, 1253 views   English (US)
Categories: Old Main

Quadrennial

Remonstrans began four years ago tomorrow, and much has changed in that time.

In 2005 I had very little knowledge of blogging and I certainly had no inkling that this exchange would go on for 208 weeks, provoke 528 posts—and I have no idea how many comments. (That's not counting the contributions of my colleagues.)

Things progressed better than expected; our influence spread to parts of the world I didn't even know satellites flew over, and world leaders called incessantly to grill me for my secrets on winning friends and strengthening old political alliances. And the bags of money piled up to the barrel vaults. I was able to acquire a modest retirement fastness pictured below [photo snapped this year before the Christmas decorations were taken down], and many was the night I paced the western parapets trying to decide which fresh religious indecency illustrated most eloquently the faithlessness of this century.

Schloss Dissidens

(My wife had no idea she would have to dust so many balustrades and iron so many pajamas.)

On the other hand, much has stayed exactly the same.

It seems that the church has become quite accomplished at drifting through the Seven Seas, its scurvied shipmates brandishing nerf cutlasses and bragging about what effective seamen they'd become. The ship always comes to life when a new poll is released and everyone meets on the quarterdeck to decide who should wear the albatross.

High seas; good times.

And of course the completely indigestible devotional life of the believer continues: the booklets, the tapes, the vibes, the CDs, the soul patches, the skits, the ditties, the couches, the speculations about the eschaton, the conferences, the resolutions....

And the institutions keep grinding out new justifications for their existence and we, like devoted worshippers of Moloch, keep giving them our children.

Evangelicalism, I read recently, is more of a "religious mood". Can you believe that? A mood. It's a pessimism, a longing, some mystical moments, a conviction that things are redeemed through suffering and a passion to make a difference.

It is a spiritual sensibility that includes pessimism about human nature, a longing to be converted from the worst of our selves, mystical moments when Jesus Christ is experienced, a conviction that nothing can be redeemed without suffering and that resurrection is ultimate reality, and a passion to make a difference in the world.

So this is the faith of St. Paul, is it?

Anyway, I can't promise that Remontrans will be around four more years, but for however long it lasts I hope it will continue to reject the spirit of the age and oppose the philistines.

Trackback address for this post:

This is a captcha-picture. It is used to prevent mass-access by robots.

Please enter the characters from the image above. (case insensitive)

Comments, Trackbacks, Pingbacks:

1 Comment from: AR [Visitor] Email
Please do.

"A pessimism about human nature..." that's what I was talking about in "A Question of Art." I think that IS a question of art. I don't know how much right I have to talk about "the other camp" any more, but I do have family and friends over there, and this question of "pessimism about human nature" is really destructive and a stumblingblock in many arenas.

My brother and Dad are at an impasse on the question of music. My dad, a staunch Calvinist, has come to the conclusion that good, Christian music should not have emotion in it. I believe this is related to his view of depravity. His conclusion is also based on the music available to him in his church. He is copletely reliant on them at this point because he works such long hours that he no longer has time to read anything but the Bible. He effectively blocked the Baptist church they attend from buying Majesty Hymnal but instead they bought a hymnal of ditties from the good old tent-meetin' times. My brother loathes this hymnal. It has no feeling, he complains. Only blinding ignorance could conclude that emotion does not belong in Christian music. He loves David Phelps because Phelps seems to really feel what he's singing about and he actually knows how to use his voice. David Phelps has operatic training but is now part of the new and improved Gaither band.

This is what well-meaning people do when the music and the theological "mood" they are given reacts violently against the truest desires of their hearts.
PermalinkPermalink 03/20/09 @ 08:51

Reply to comment 6027 by AR

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 Comment from: Sofros [Visitor] Email
I don't know if you have seen this yet...but heaven help Minnesota - if there is any recovery left for this state.

http://www.dougpagitt.com/media/Downloads/Brochure.pdf
PermalinkPermalink 03/21/09 @ 09:48

Reply to comment 6029 by Sofros

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 Comment from: dissidens [Member] Email
AR:

The Gaither Band has improved?!

I think your family illustrates a widespread problem.

Fundagelicalism’s long-standing trivialization of doctrine and superficiality of emotion has created a horrible situation. People rightly reject the trifling impiety of, say, Amy Grant and Soundfroth, and then feel drawn to some novelty which inevitably loses its appeal when the glitter falls off.

If only there were a way to recognize truth and beauty when we see it!


Sofros:

Yes, I’ve been following Pagitt’s futile attempt to gain a following in a state with remarkably low expectations of politicians. Doug knows as much about politics and economics as he does theology.

His blog has become nothing more than a dispensary for the sorriest political chats I’ve ever heard. You happen to know who he’s running against? I think if that guy can find either one of his elbows in the space of twenty minutes, Pagitt hasn’t a chance.
PermalinkPermalink 03/21/09 @ 10:39

Reply to comment 6030 by dissidens

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 Comment from: exlibris [Visitor] Email
And the institutions keep grinding out new justifications for their existence and we, like devoted worshippers of Moloch, keep giving them our children.

Let's see if we can rework that.

And the blogs keep grinding out new justifications for their existence and we, like devoted readers of Playboy, keep giving them our slobbering attention.

Tongue-in-cheek. This is one of the better venues.

I'm not justifying any institution's existence, but not all of us can blog. Someone needs to mind the library, else the institution will raze it.
PermalinkPermalink 03/21/09 @ 12:23

Reply to comment 6031 by exlibris

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 Comment from: dissidens [Member] Email

ex libris:

Well, as plausible as your rework is [har har har], it’s not bloggers who ruined this culture and it’s not bloggers who will reform it.

We don’t take money, we don’t make policies, we don’t sell products, we don’t indoctrinate your children, and we don’t run radio stations which cater to the lowest possible religious imagination.

I wish we had made this mess if only so we could clean it up.
PermalinkPermalink 03/21/09 @ 14:17

Reply to comment 6032 by dissidens

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 Comment from: exlibris [Visitor] Email
"It’s not bloggers who ruined this culture and it’s not bloggers who will reform it."

Quite right, but like librarians, they can subvert its evils.

Happy Fourth! Lord willin', I look forward to four more.
PermalinkPermalink 03/21/09 @ 17:41

Reply to comment 6033 by exlibris

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 Comment from: AR [Visitor] Email
Thanks, Dissidens, you're quite right. I did feel the story was an example.

Phelps' voice in itself is pretty grand; the use to which he puts it is a sad story. The Gaither band, heh heh heh, has been "updated" but it's more or less what it always was.

Please accept my congratulations on the blog's anniversary.
PermalinkPermalink 03/21/09 @ 18:57

Reply to comment 6034 by AR

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 Comment from: dissidens [Member] Email

Thanks to both of you.

All I know about David Phelps is what I heard on his blog. Gaither, though, is a known quantity.
PermalinkPermalink 03/22/09 @ 10:41

Reply to comment 6035 by dissidens

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 Comment from: bmp [Visitor] Email
RE: "I wish we had made this mess if only so we could clean it up."

Many times a mess is cleaned up by those who had nothing to do with making it in the first place.
PermalinkPermalink 03/25/09 @ 11:36

Reply to comment 6038 by bmp

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10 Comment from: dissidens [Member] Email

Sometimes that does happen. But in the context of exlibris’s remark, I think we have to remind ourselves that publishing ideas and provoking thought is very different from tearing down corrupt and destructive institutions. Anyone can dabble in the first; it takes men of conscience, principle and will to do the second.

In addition it must be noted that these institutions have run off the men of integrity who might do such things. I think it is fair to say that today’s politicians try very hard to appear informed, thoughtful and principled while perpetuating those very institutions because they give them visibility.

Think of men like Machen, Tozer, Weaver, Wells—many of those we’ve devoted our attention to here on Remonstrans—who speak to us from on high while the “men of action” merely ride the wave and preserve the status quo.
PermalinkPermalink 03/25/09 @ 12:06

Reply to comment 6039 by dissidens

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
11 Comment from: bmp [Visitor] Email
Yes, these men had the moral courage both to build and to destroy. However, I don't believe that they labored under the assumption that they could clean up a mess only if they made it.

I do concur that the clean up requires the moral courage to declare a mess to be what it is and to stick with the opinion (and the actions that follow) despite the predictable defense of the status quo from institutions and individuals alike.

Congratulations, as well, on your 4th anniversary, and thanks for the forum you've provided to friends and others.
PermalinkPermalink 03/25/09 @ 14:17

Reply to comment 6040 by bmp

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12 Comment from: the divine passive [Visitor] Email
Wow, nice house. Must not be in the Midwest: the driveway would be purgatory in the winter. Can you hear the "kerplunk" if you throw a Majesty hymnal into the moat from the parapets?

Congratulations on four years of making people either think or deliberately not think, according to their idiom.
PermalinkPermalink 03/25/09 @ 15:58

Reply to comment 6041 by the divine passive

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
13 Comment from: dissidens [Member] Email

bmp:

We seem to be wandering a bit here. My point is not that people who haven’t made a mess have never been inclined to clean it up. Clearly that has happened on occasion, as I said explicitly in comment #10. Those with a loyalty to their institutions have very often considered this the most desirable remedy. My point to exlibris was to distinguish between bloggers who merely publish ideas and institutions which, first, last and always, preserve themselves. If we did take money, if we made policies, if we sold products, if we did indoctrinate children, and if we ran radio stations which catered to the lowest possible religious imagination, then we would be in a position to effect change.

These institutions must be grabbed by the throat. I know of no bloggers grabbing anything by the throat, and I certainly am not.

As I’ve said many times: I haven’t given, I’m not giving, and I never will give a dry bean for these institutions. A few years ago I came—was driven, actually—to the conclusion that these institutions can perish along with their defenders: my interest is in the refugees and escapees who will have to live in the ruins. It is now that they need to be told that there are alternatives other than those offered by boosters and profiteers.

And thanks, by the way.


dp:

Actually, the only sounds I hear are the rebound of the catapult, the whoosh, and the sound of surprised birds taking flight.

And my wife insists I help shovel the driveway in winter. So the place has pluses and minuses.

I’m working on the carbon footprint of the place: I’m hoping to cut the heating bill down to two rain forests per decade.
PermalinkPermalink 03/25/09 @ 20:06

Reply to comment 6042 by dissidens

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
14 Comment from: Sam Hendrickson [Visitor] Email · http://theologshmeolog.wordpress.com
Diss,
"four more years...four more years..." I have often imprecated for term limits on blogs, but yours goes on anyway! I must be out of fellowship.

Not to discolor the pool too much, but I do notice that S/I is still going too, so perhaps I should be uncertain as to the value of r'trans.net's blogevity !? Did I say that?
Anyhoo, thanks for your s/times warped gimlet eye... (like my opinion matters--Linscott is the smart one, not me). Prosit!
PermalinkPermalink 03/26/09 @ 12:21

Reply to comment 6043 by Sam Hendrickson

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
15 Comment from: dissidens [Member] Email

Thanks, Sam.
PermalinkPermalink 03/26/09 @ 14:37

Reply to comment 6044 by dissidens

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.

Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small, a>
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email and url)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will NOT be displayed.))
This is a captcha-picture. It is used to prevent mass-access by robots.

Please enter the characters from the image above. (case insensitive)

Remonstrans

September 2010
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 << <   > >>
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30    

Archives

Search

Categories

XML Feeds

What is RSS?

Who's Online?

  • Guest Users: 33

powered by
b2evolution