banner

Thanksgiving 2009

11/30/09

Permalink 06:02:45 am, by dissidens Email , 296 words, 1429 views   English (US)
Categories: Old Main

Thanksgiving 2009

Our seasonal gratitude and holiday celebrations afforded us a measure of respite from any serious review of Recent Events of Great Consequence (like the Manhattan Declaration and emergent's pursuit of "art" and "conversation"). Generate published its first issue, and the three most responsible culprits excuse their "print artifact" here at TheSchmooze.

These fashion hounds of the emerging church explain why their conversation justifies the cutting down of perfectly good trees which might have been better used to make nasty splinters.

Anyhow, we forsook the dubyahdubyahdubyah and travelled with friends over to Homer, L'zzyanna, to disguise ourselves as typical holiday revelers on Lake Claiborne. In Cabin #7 the traditional jigsaw puzzle was set out, we ate food, we played games, we ate food, we exchanged gifts and awarded prizes, we ate food, we watched football, we ate food, we taunted one another for personal discrepancies, failings, idiosyncrasies and youthful misjudgments.

Some of us played a round of dimpleball at the Homer Golf Course. Halfway through the first nine we found the putting green next to some picnic tables and the restrooms! (I don't always take a putter into the Men's Room, but when I do, I prefer a Ping.)

We took a stroll around and a gander at the Claiborne Parish Courthouse, one of the very few remaining ante-bellum civic buildings.

We stopped in the PigglyWiggly on North 2nd for a bag of Claey's Horehound hard candies which constituted my entire Louisiana Purchase.

We built many fires.

But it was pleasant, it was relaxing, it was enjoyable and we harmed no one.

All that is history now as we return to the disturbing world of theologians and church-tinkerers and where little is pleasant, relaxing or enjoyable and where many are grievously harmed.

Trackback address for this post:

This is a captcha-picture. It is used to prevent mass-access by robots.

Please enter the characters from the image above. (case insensitive)

Comments, Trackbacks, Pingbacks:

1 Comment from: Joshua Allen [Visitor] Email
Our vacation was cut short by my being called into unexpected pall-bearer duty for the second time this year; we were on airplanes for about 10 hours on Thanksgiving. So for me, it's kind of nice to be back to normalcy, even if it involves cringing at the food fight over Manhattan project, or Naked Pastor's revelation that "the Bible isn't truth, it's art". And the nekkid preacher's definition of "art" is certainly not anything like what Scruton talks about in "on culture". Perhaps N.P.'s own doodlings will one day achieve the status of canon.
PermalinkPermalink 11/30/09 @ 16:49

Reply to comment 6588 by Joshua Allen

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 Comment from: dissidens [Member] Email

Well, that’s exactly right, and all our other readers should take special note of this fact.

We do not pick on Hayward because he is creative (because he isn’t—you can find his sort of work in every hole-in-the-wall art class being offered everywhere people are desperate to sell art supplies). We do not make fun of Scandrette’s faux beat poetry because it is especially dim-witted and shallow. We merely laugh at his juvenile camp on Sparkhouse because it is so obvious and so ham-fisted that we see the pretense for what it is. We grew up in the same image-manipulated world he did! And we do not point out McLaren’s lame doggerel because it is unlike piles and piles of similar adolescent reveries. We look at and listen to Tim Snyder talk about art and we observe a talking cartoon.

It is important that we note these things because of what they themselves tell us.

They reject the truth of the historic church in favor of this stuff! Hayward claims to be a preacher inhabited by an artist; it only makes sense to examine his art.

This is their “art”, their “creativity”, their mastery of “image” as opposed to word. A favorite word of emergence is “intentionality”.

(This is no different from listening carefully to fundamentalists when they tell us they are serious or evangelicals when they tell us they are evangelists.)

We would be stupid not to laugh at these people. This is Barney Fife as lawman.

Laugh and learn, people.
PermalinkPermalink 12/01/09 @ 05:18

Reply to comment 6589 by dissidens

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 Comment from: BLT [Visitor]
I recently threw away a bag of Claey's Horehound. The remaining candies had all melded into an unsightly, inedible glob. Maybe I should have framed or mounted it as artwork instead. It probably wouldn't be hard to find someone who thought it was "beautiful."
PermalinkPermalink 12/02/09 @ 09:57

Reply to comment 6590 by BLT

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 Comment from: dissidens [Member] Email

You should have come up with some smarmy justification and sent it to paul@generatemagazine.com. Paul is Head of Postmodern Gewgaws.

I'm sure he would think it beautiful.
PermalinkPermalink 12/02/09 @ 12:35

Reply to comment 6591 by dissidens

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 Comment from: Todd Pruitt [Visitor] Email · http://toddpruitt.blogspot.com
Okay, so I watched Spenser interview with the intrepid publishers. While I did get to hear the word "conversation" about 48 times I was disappointed that I did not hear the word "gernerative."

I really want to be nice to them but they simply won't allow it. If I were casting and scripting a parody of emergent types it would have been that interview and that panel, exactly.
PermalinkPermalink 12/03/09 @ 11:31

Reply to comment 6592 by Todd Pruitt

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 Comment from: dissidens [Member] Email

Isn’t it singularly appropriate that this was shot in a Barney-the-Dinosaur purple children’s library?

And the fact that they considered there would be trees involved shows the profundity of their thought.

These are real prodigies.

I look for even greater things in the future.
PermalinkPermalink 12/03/09 @ 14:56

Reply to comment 6593 by dissidens

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.

Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small, a>
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email and url)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will NOT be displayed.))
This is a captcha-picture. It is used to prevent mass-access by robots.

Please enter the characters from the image above. (case insensitive)

Remonstrans

September 2010
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 << <   > >>
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30    

Archives

Search

Categories

XML Feeds

What is RSS?

Who's Online?

  • Guest Users: 38

powered by
b2evolution