banner

Some People Are Just Too Easily Amazed

12/07/09

Permalink 05:48:52 am, by dissidens Email , 611 words, 3179 views   English (US)
Categories: Old Main

Some People Are Just Too Easily Amazed

 

I'm amazed at the amount of time people spend on the internet. I'm not against technology, but all tools should be used to their best advantage. We should be spending our time on things that have staying power, instead of on the latest thought of the latest blogger-and then moving on quickly to the next blogger. That makes us more superficial, not more thoughtful.

---J. I. Packer

Does he have a point?

No, sadly, he does not have a point. If he had stopped with "We should be spending our time on things that have staying power..." he would not only have had a point, he would have offered us some very helpful and timely advice.

What we have here, I'm afraid, is an opinion on the order of the 4-year old who delivers himself of his judgment on spinach by throwing his spoon to the floor. I'd be inclined to give Dr. Packer a more patient hearing if I knew him regularly to tell people "we should spend our time on permanent things instead of reading the vapid opinions of church functionaries in the official organs of their religious institutions" or "we should be spending our time with those Samuel Davies called ‘the venerable dead' rather than wading through the swill and swagger of Christianity Today, Christian Century, Eternity, Leadership Journal, and World Magazine."

J.I. and his ilk have not given to my generation a very compelling example of a serious world of letters. Had they done that, bloggers would not have an audience.

You won't sell many rhinestones to people who already have diamonds.

Sorry, Dr. Packer, but it must be asked: have you been in a Christian bookstore in the last 20 years? Have you read the books your own publishers have marketed? Have you taken a fair sampling of the magazine that now quotes you?

Blogging is not the problem. The problem is much, much larger than that.

Let us be serious for just a moment, shall we? If you leave us a world full of Dan Rathers, don't be amazed to find bloggers; amazement is unbecoming.

There is not a place for us to look in this wide world where we don't see falsehood, hypocrisy, idolatry, and pretense. There is hardly a show, a commercial, an advertisement, a church ad, a magazine article, a religious publication, or weather report that isn't superficial about race, gender [sic], religion, beauty, happiness, piety or truth. In fact, yours is the generation above all others that has "branded" the truth. Why should you dare to be amazed that there is a reaction to this state of confusion?

My own advice is to see blogging for what it is: a necessary, an inevitable, and even a reasonable reaction to the shambles that was left us. Could blogging be done better? Of course it could; and I wish it were. We follow some blogs that are travesties of reason and crimes against language. But let's recognize blogging for what it is; when blogging is done right, it is a conversation where there was none. And I'll put some blog conversations I have seen up with anything found in the Letters Section of most magazines, certainly the religious magazines that have made your name well known.

Imagine a blogosphere populated with men like Swift, Pope, Milton, Herbert, Eliot, Chesterton, Muggeridge, Charles Williams, Barfield.... The fault is not with the blogging, the fault is the deformed and flabby Evangelicalism you left us. The real problem is a superficial Christianity.

Blogging is very much the unflattering consequence of your negligence toward "things that have staying power".

Trackback address for this post:

This is a captcha-picture. It is used to prevent mass-access by robots.

Please enter the characters from the image above. (case insensitive)

Comments, Trackbacks, Pingbacks:

1 Comment from: exlibris [Visitor] Email
Taking your argument just a little further by using the analogy of the market; in a culture that values permanent things, does the expression of the permanent things in some way become commoditized?
PermalinkPermalink 12/07/09 @ 07:54

Reply to comment 6603 by exlibris

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 Comment from: Victoria [Visitor] Email
Very well said!
PermalinkPermalink 12/07/09 @ 08:53

Reply to comment 6604 by Victoria

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 Comment from: dissidens [Member] Email

ex:

It’s really hard to say. My first blush answer is to say No, but commoditize means a lot of things to different people. I know I’ve learned nothing from Adorno, but a useful answer depends on agreeing on what commoditization involves.

PermalinkPermalink 12/07/09 @ 19:19

Reply to comment 6607 by dissidens

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 Comment from: BLT [Visitor]
Maybe Packer is lashing out at the internet because he's smarting from the recent video making the blog rounds in which Carl Trueman talks about what he perceives to be Brother Jim's failures in evangelicalism.
PermalinkPermalink 12/09/09 @ 06:18

Reply to comment 6610 by BLT

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 Comment from: dissidens [Member] Email

That occurred to me and to some others (on other blogs). There may be something to that; I also know there is a touch of resentment on the part of some that “institutional voices” tend to fare badly when compared to some bloggers. People with an interest in maintaining the status quo by publishing official dogma don’t like being questioned by upstarts.

Like Dan Rather was. People who have make-up artists get them presentable to lie to the cameras get very annoyed with people in pajamas telling the truth.

There is nothing new under the sun: popes had disparaging things to say about pamphleteers.

But what excites my interest more is this almost reflexive contempt for new things which are perceived as a radical departure when in fact they are really necessary consequences of existing but unrecognized attitudes. For bloggers to be accused of being superficial by any mainstay of glib evangelicalism tells us something interesting about our religious habitat.

If Junior is superficial, there’s a good chance he learned that at Daddy’s knee. (Or in front of Daddy’s TV.)

I think that is the great lesson of Emergence.
PermalinkPermalink 12/09/09 @ 06:48

Reply to comment 6611 by dissidens

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 Comment from: Chris C [Visitor]
Dissidens: I cannot express enough my appreciation for the way in which the Lord has graced you with your ability to use words and/or language the way you do. Thank you for using your gift faithfully, in a way that honors Christ amidst a sea of so-called evangelicals who disgrace the glorious name of our Lord daily...hourly. Because the greatest assaults against the church today are ideological attacks against the truth, and because manipulation of language amongst multitudes of false teachers and damnable apostates is the practical means of spreading lies in the war against the truth, those of us who truly love Christ cannot help but to have such great appreciation for men like you--whose skillful ability with words counters the multitudes of postmodern manipulation of language and meaning. You clearly and concisely expose wolves plainly for who and what they are! Keep blogging!
PermalinkPermalink 12/09/09 @ 15:41

Reply to comment 6612 by Chris C

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 Comment from: Chris C [Visitor]
Just to clarify: I am not suggesting in my comment that Packer is among those whom I describe; I am actually just making a general comment of appreciation for many of the posts I read on your blog.
PermalinkPermalink 12/09/09 @ 15:47

Reply to comment 6613 by Chris C

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 Comment from: dissidens [Member] Email

Well, I don’t know if I can live up to that compliment, but I do think two things you say are quite true.

1. We have no remaining unmolested certitudes; everything is up for grabs. The pigs are at the trough and the wolves are running free.

2. Those institutions we’ve placed our trust in have failed us. Schools, publishing houses, mission agencies, and our denominational contraptions—apparently sketched on a napkin by a drunken Rube Goldberg—are more useful to our enemy than to us.
I think the hour calls for people who can speak clearly to confused and defrauded believers. I’m hoping the next generations will contain some Tituses w/ Heavy Starch.
PermalinkPermalink 12/09/09 @ 17:44

Reply to comment 6614 by dissidens

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 Comment from: Frank Turk [Visitor] Email · http://centuri0n.blogspot.com
I'll bet you won't sign the Manhattan Declaration either, you malcontent.
PermalinkPermalink 12/09/09 @ 20:46

Reply to comment 6615 by Frank Turk

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10 Comment from: dissidens [Member] Email

Well, Frank, there’s good news, there’s even better news, and then there’s the bad news:

The good news is that I would not sign the Manhattan Declaration; the even better news is that no one cares that I don’t sign it because it is, after all, nothing but a gimmick, a public declaration alien to the teaching and practice of the Apostles. The bad news is that so many professing Christians can no longer perceive the difference between the Kingdom of God and the Kingdom of this world.

I can imagine Jesus and the Twelve passing these resolutions following the Olivet Discourse:
WHEREAS there is no place for Rome in the prophecies of old, and

WHEREAS all manner of ceremonial uncleanness takes place in the land that was promised unto our forefathers, and

WHEREAS we are not all that fond of paying punitive taxes for the support of these moral outrages,

BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED that Herod will not enjoy our full support in the next election,

AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that we will not comply with any edict that purports to compel our institutions to participate in Caesar’s hegemonic policies.

PermalinkPermalink 12/10/09 @ 07:08

Reply to comment 6616 by dissidens

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.

Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small, a>
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email and url)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will NOT be displayed.))
This is a captcha-picture. It is used to prevent mass-access by robots.

Please enter the characters from the image above. (case insensitive)

Remonstrans

September 2010
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 << <   > >>
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30    

Archives

Search

Categories

XML Feeds

What is RSS?

Who's Online?

  • Guest Users: 34

powered by
b2evolution