banner

Trinkets For Christmas

12/14/09

Permalink 05:49:43 am, by dissidens Email , 410 words, 1987 views   English (US)
Categories: Old Main

Trinkets For Christmas

Before the Happy Holidays get here and we meet in the streets and malls for our seasonal riots of self-indulgence, before our keen spiritual perceptions become dulled with a thousand movies about Camden Town and Mount Crumpit, we might reflect on recent events.

It is obvious to both church-attenders and church-abstainers that there is something seriously wrong with pulpit and altar.

We can't help observing that when a gang of religious celebrities ostentatiously signs a declaration on life, marriage and religious liberty, religion is not in the bloom of its youth. That there should follow a raging debate about how some came to sign it and others did not, we might wonder if religion is worth our notice. From what I've learned, this statement reveals a significant disagreement over the meaning of the Gospel!

Isn't that inspiring? I think we can put to rest any looming threat from "organized religion".

I love it when Fundamentalists tell us they are serious and then continue marketing the same insipid, meaningless, irritating rituals their children have rejected and which we'd be humiliated to bring our friends to watch. Do serious people trivialize their god like this?

Almost as much, I love it when an Evangelical grand poobah steps out of the movement's baronial publishing houses to express concern over the superficialities he's discovered on the internet.

Some day—and it won't be today—it may occur to believers that if churchmen make a statement on life, marriage and religious liberty and it only succeeds in revealing their misperceptions of the Gospel, we'll have rounded a scenic bend.

If the Evangelical church cannot identify the Gospel it was given, can it be trusted to carry it to the world? If it persists in its mawkish self-indulgence and trinket-mongering, does it even have a message of repentance worth bringing to us? And if it has no call to repentance, why should people listen to anything it says? Because it claims "a 2,000-year tradition of proclaiming God's word, seeking justice in our societies, resisting tyranny, and reaching out with compassion to the poor, oppressed and suffering"?

Instead we get "devotion to human dignity"? How Dickensian.

Please! I can't speak for every last soul on the earth, but just speaking for myself I don't care to hear what these people have to say about dignity.

When the Son of Man cometh, will he find devotion to human dignity on the earth?

Trackback address for this post:

This is a captcha-picture. It is used to prevent mass-access by robots.

Please enter the characters from the image above. (case insensitive)

Comments, Trackbacks, Pingbacks:

1 Comment from: Watchman [Visitor] Email · http://www.watchmanswords.blogspot.com
Yes, I think He will.

Whether He will be pleased with such a finding however...
PermalinkPermalink 12/14/09 @ 06:34

Reply to comment 6621 by Watchman

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 Comment from: Sam H [Member] Email
Agreeing...
But, am curious as to the meaning of paragraphs 3 & 5? Namely the last sentence of 3, and what rituals are you speaking to in 5?
Cheers
PermalinkPermalink 12/14/09 @ 07:52

Reply to comment 6622 by Sam H

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 Comment from: dissidens [Member] Email
Well, I wanted to tie together a few recent posts without being too ham-fisted or too preachy about it.

First of all (and what I didn’t say) was that yesterday I endured a sermon wherein the preacher told us about his great love for Dickens’ Christmas Carol. I can’t tell whether he’s read the story or not; I got the clear sense that what he most enjoyed was seeing television dramatizations of the story, and he named off about 10 actors who have played the role of Scrooge. The thrust of his sermon was to tell us that he loved the story and it meant more to him than it did even to Dickens. In a very crude and hobbling way he was trying to say that the “real” Christmas spirit and the Bethlehem story would produce a better Scrooge than Dickens’ Christmas Carol.

All of that struck me as of a piece with recent Emergent attempts to strike an artistic pose without knowing anything about how art really works. That in turn led to a recollection of Scruton’s observations about our loss of the cohesive effects of art which we’ve abandoned in favor of individual, solipsistic gratification.

Given that all of that is obvious to some of us, it is painfully ironic that a group of men attempt to declare a political position based on what they suppose is a religious foundation, and what they succeed in doing is revisit the whole confusion in Christendom about what constitutes the Gospel.

So much has been said about when and where and with whom co-belligerence is permissible. I think the more frightening lesson here is the abject confusion about what the faith is. It does seem that religious people think they can produce better Scrooges.

By “rituals” I mean the impotent and nostalgic formalisms that might be remedied by true art, but which no longer has a place in the Christian imagination.

Weakness in the pulpit and at the altar has become failure in the public square.
PermalinkPermalink 12/14/09 @ 08:47

Reply to comment 6623 by dissidens

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 Comment from: Sam H [Member] Email
Re: Scrooge. 1951 Alistair Sim. His portrayal of the entrenched Scrooge to the "redeemed" Ebenezer pleases me every time. The story overall--thin and flat as much of Dickens. Sim's portrayal rescues it for me and teaches something of the dramatic change connected to true regeneration. His is a humble fool on Christmas morn. Surely this is more than Dickens hoped I would "get" from A Christmas Carol, but I'm all about sensus plenior. Don't plan on preaching on it though--my Eldridge W. message is shaping up quite nicely!
PermalinkPermalink 12/14/09 @ 09:24

Reply to comment 6624 by Sam H

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 Comment from: Sam H [Member] Email
BTW, fully understanding that this Christmas Carol has significant changes from the original.
PermalinkPermalink 12/14/09 @ 09:33

Reply to comment 6625 by Sam H

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 Comment from: dissidens [Member] Email

I think Sim's Scrooge is the only one I've seen. And by "seen" I mean it was showing in the same room where I was being attacked by a dog and three children who took issue with my Bah! Humbug.

I can't recall making any informed judgment about the acting, I just recall the unconvincing special effects and thinking that Dickens was finally getting his comeuppance.

MacDonald could out-write Dickens any day of the week.
PermalinkPermalink 12/14/09 @ 10:28

Reply to comment 6626 by dissidens

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 Comment from: Jeremiah [Visitor] Email
Ronald or George? Or Both?
PermalinkPermalink 12/14/09 @ 10:49

Reply to comment 6627 by Jeremiah

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 Comment from: Joshua Allen [Visitor] Email
Well said! I always found it comical when some liberal politician would pander for votes by railing against Christians, with a rallying cry of "If you let the conservative politician win, FUNDIES will come to your HOME and TAKE AWAY YOUR PORN!"

No doubt, many fundies still nurse fantasies of forcibly stealing the nation's porn. But the comical part was the presupposition that Christians had any such sort of coordination or power, or that Christians were in imminent danger of grasping such power.

And while the "manhattan" affair will be used by these same politicians to scare their base with the bogeyman of coordinated Christianity, it really just shows how farcical the notion is.

PermalinkPermalink 12/14/09 @ 10:53

Reply to comment 6628 by Joshua Allen

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 Comment from: dissidens [Member] Email

Jeremiah:

Ronald has only one "a" in his last name.

George, the writer of the brilliant Lilith, a story that made it onto my "biography shelf".
PermalinkPermalink 12/14/09 @ 10:57

Reply to comment 6629 by dissidens

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10 Comment from: dissidens [Member] Email

Josh:

Politicians are the only proof we need that Hell was an excellent idea.
PermalinkPermalink 12/14/09 @ 11:03

Reply to comment 6633 by dissidens

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
11 Comment from: Jeremiah [Visitor] Email
Dissidens:

I realized my mistake after I hit post. I do enjoy reading MacDonald, though I have not yet read Lilith.
PermalinkPermalink 12/14/09 @ 11:08

Reply to comment 6634 by Jeremiah

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12 Comment from: the divine passive [Visitor] Email
Boy howdy, no church history cliche goes unused in the preamble to the Muppets Take Manhattan Project Declaration. Like the ubiquitous orphan character in Dickens, so the ubiquitous interpretation of the RCC's pragmatic posturings as "social conscience."
PermalinkPermalink 12/14/09 @ 11:16

Reply to comment 6635 by the divine passive

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
13 Comment from: Sam H [Member] Email
Dissidens,
so, is there anyone speaking cogently (in some respect)not only to the folly of ManDec, but also to what ought to be?
PermalinkPermalink 12/14/09 @ 12:26

Reply to comment 6636 by Sam H

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
14 Comment from: dissidens [Member] Email

I really don’t know, Sam, I tend not to follow these things. They’re silly. I view them as feel-good events which do nothing more than grab the cameras for a few moments and try to maintain some comforting sense of group identity.

My view is that we need to take a step back and reconsider our grasp of permanent things. I don’t think the church wants to do this; it is too heavily invested in its own fictions.

We need preachers who understand first things; we get clueless politicians. Like with King Saul, sometimes God lets us have our pretty-boy kings.

If an angel from Heaven came down and asked me if I thought God should help these people with their programs, I would spew my eggnog and tell him, “If these people refuse to preach his Word and worship him like adults, I’m all for him lettin’ loose with that Four Horseman thing I read about…and say Hi to J.S.B. when you get back.”

Or words to that effect.


PermalinkPermalink 12/14/09 @ 13:49

Reply to comment 6637 by dissidens

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.

Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small, a>
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email and url)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will NOT be displayed.))
This is a captcha-picture. It is used to prevent mass-access by robots.

Please enter the characters from the image above. (case insensitive)

Remonstrans

March 2010
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 << <   > >>
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31    

Archives

Search

Categories

XML Feeds

What is RSS?

Who's Online?

  • Guest Users: 25

powered by
b2evolution